University Futures, Library Futures
OCLC Research is pleased to be collaborating with Ithaka S+R on a project examining the impact of increased institutional differentiation in universities on the organization of academic libraries and the services they provide. The project is generously supported by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Constance Malpas and Rona Stein are presenting a briefing on the University Futures, Library Futures project at the CNI Spring Meeting in San Diego, CA on 12 April 2018.
Keep up to date on the project by following the Hanging Together blog. Recent posts on the University Futures, Library Futures project include:
Literature Review Preview
Read a preview of the literature review Toward a New Understanding of American Higher Education Institutions: Focus of Educational Offer, Mode of Provision, which provides context for the institution typology OCLC has developed to support this project.
Topics covered in the literature review include:
- The centrality of higher education to US nation-building
- Major shifts in higher education student profile
- Variations in higher education provision
- Existing classifications of higher education institutions
- Key institutional characteristics of higher education institutions
Data Set and Scoring Formula
Launched in March 2017, the University Futures, Library Futures project is examining how changes in the US higher education landscape are informing the organization and delivery of academic library services. To enable a systematic examination and comparison of US higher education institutions, OCLC researchers Constance Malpas and Rona Stein developed a working model, which is based on statistical indicators of 1,500 US colleges and universities.
Their model reveals two dimensions:
- The Primary Educational Activity, which they conceive of as the "WHAT" dimension, tracks educational offers with a Research, Liberal Education, or Career focus
- The Enrollment Profile and Learning Experience, which they conceive of as the "FOR WHOM AND HOW" dimension, tracks mode of provision on a Traditional-Residential to New-Traditional/Flexible continuum.
Now Malpas and Stein are making the underlying dataset for the UFLF project along with the scoring formula available for download.
What we’re doing
For decades, models of excellence in academic library service have been shaped by a collections-centric paradigm in which the size of local print inventory is considered a key indicator of quality. Despite growing attention to a “service turn” in college and university libraries, efforts to revitalize the public service by retooling subject specialists and bibliographers as disciplinary liaisons, increasing engagement with teaching and learning activities and the like, university recruitment and marketing efforts often perpetuate a view that volume count is a recognized metric of excellence. With generous support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, OCLC Research and Ithaka are joining forces to develop a new framework for understanding the fit between emerging library service paradigms and university types.
Why we’re doing it
Higher education is the subject of an intense debate about mission, organization and direction. An important strand is the discussion about institutional isomorphism, which has featured centrally in influential recent contributions. Institutional isomorphism refers to the tendency of institutions in a field to resemble each other over time, shaped by coercive (mandated) or normative (professional) influences. In the higher education field, Michael Crow and William Dabars have coined the terms “Harvardization” and “Berkeley envy” for a historical trend they observe: universities have aspired to those institutions as common models of excellence.
Among research libraries, a longstanding focus on competitive volume counts and comparative “library investment” underpin a normative isomorphism with respect to collections and funding. Rank is determined by size and expense rather than impact. However, it has become increasingly clear that universities are sorting themselves into new patterns of development. For example, Arizona State University is very deliberately charting a course as a new type of mega-university, attempting to increase both inclusiveness and research excellence. Other patterns are apparent; for example, the residential liberal arts college, which is developing career-oriented professional online offerings, the regional public university seeking to streamline based on a distinctive career focus, the system with shared services, and so on. Over time, these will each demand particular library services.
Against this background we are embarking on a study that takes a more realistically plural view of the future of the academic library. Different types of academic libraries will be on different vectors, influenced by the types of universities or colleges they support.
How we’ll be working together
Over the next year, into mid 2018, OCLC Research and Ithaka S+R will develop a heuristic typology of colleges and universities that acknowledges the increasing fragmentation and specialization of higher education business models, and explore the degree to which libraries are aligning services to emerging institutional needs. We hypothesize that libraries within institutions that are strongly “typed” along one or more dimensions will exhibit greater similarity in the scope of library service offerings, while libraries serving institutions with a less pronounced type (or multiple, competing types) will have a more diffuse service profile. A possible implication is that institutions with a stronger type-identification will have a clearer roadmap for achieving institutionally appropriate service excellence.
We’re eager to engage with partners in the higher education and academic library communities as this project moves forward. Feel free to get in touch!
Contact project team member Constance Malpas at email@example.com.
Project Lead Constance Malpas gave the presentation "University Futures, Library Futures: re-examining academic library relevance" at the Americas Regional Council in October 2017.
The Curious Case of Balanced/Equilateral Higher Education Institutions and Potential Implications for Academic Libraries Hanging Together | 2018-03-22
What's in a Name? More Than Meets the Eye, or IPEDS: On the Religious Identity of US Colleges and Universities Hanging Together | 2018-03-21
Scaling Innovation in Higher Education: The University Innovation Alliance (UIA) Hanging Together | 2018-03-01
University Futures, Library Futures: a multi-dimensional model of US higher education institutions Hanging Together | 2018-02-09
Beyond Counting Books Inside Higher Ed | 2017-04-11
University Futures; Library Futures Ithaka S+R Blog | 2017-04-10
Most recent updates: Page content: 2018-03-06