|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 
Staffing
Much has been written and spoken about the demographics of librarianship in the past few years. Some of it has had the tone of a Chicken Little story: the sky is falling. As the Baby Boomer librarians and paraprofessionals move through their careers like a bulge in a well-fed snake5 they worry about the apparent vacuum left by their imminent retirements. Certainly, in not so many years, a huge amount of collective experience and knowledge will be gone from cataloging departments and reference desks. At the other end of the age scale, there are not enough young librarians entering the profession to replace the retirees. Professions evolve and need to evolve and the changing demographics of this landscape will provide serious challenges to institutions. At the same time, there are and will be opportunities to restructure and change. And as we saw in the Economic Landscape, libraries worldwide continue to spend a great deal of their financial resources on staffing. Library staffing shortages could allow libraries to reorganize more easily and hire specific and new skill sets. As they always have, young staff lend a great deal of energy and enthusiasm to their workplaces.
Here are some key points about staffing made by people OCLC interviewed:
- Early adoption of innovations means a need for positions filled by highly trained staff who often cost more than “regular” staff.
- A lot of staff will retire soon but the upside to this is being able to hire staff more comfortable with e-material and virtual services.
- Too much staff time and effort is spent on trying to organize free Web content. Why do we need to do this?
- It’s hard to get older staff to consider acquiring “unpublished” material.
- Libraries should reallocate positions to newer kinds of jobs: digital scholarship, open-source projects, etc.
- More and more library directors are not librarians or academic staff—does this matter?
- Young librarians may be more willing to design systems that meet users where they are rather than the way it is now—we want the users to come to us.
- Librarians aren’t rewarded for risk-taking—the organization favors the status quo.
- Succession planning? None.
- We’re well aware of trends and issues but many staff are not truly willing to change the ways they do things.

Library Landscape: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 
|