Automatic Exposure—Technical Metadata
Objective: This RLG-led
initiative advocated capturing standard technical metadata about
digital images automatically, as part of image creation. The goals were
to
minimize the cost of acquiring this information and maximize
its
availability for preserving and maintaining access to images.
Overview: "Automatic Exposure" promoted the adoption of
the emerging standard NISO Z39.87: Data
Dictionary—Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images.
Z39.87 defines a comprehensive set of data elements that are key to an
institution's ability to manage and preserve its digital images.
RLG engaged manufacturer-vendors of high-end scanners and
digital cameras,
as well as cultural heritage professionals, to determine how their
devices could automatically capture Z39.97 elements for use in digital
repositories and digital-asset management systems.
Milestones
September 2005
The comment period for the revised version of NISO
Z39.87 ended on August 26th, 2005 and the standard is now being
balloted. As soon as the standard has been released in its final form,
RLG will start discussing automated capture of technical metadata with
manufacturers again.
RLG is working on an Adobe Extensible Metadata Platform
(XMP) panel. The panel would show users
the Z39.87 metadata elements as part of the File Info dialog.
It will show which values have been automatically
harvested from the image by the XMP, and which values are missing.
Furthermore, the panel will allow users to economically add values.
January 2005
Robin
Dale and Günter Waibel published a review
of harvesting technologies in RLG DigiNews,
October 2004 contained an [link to
"/en/page.php?Page_ID=20462#article1] article
about Automatic Exposure by Robin Dale and Günter Waibel, as
well as a [link to "/en/page.php?Page_ID=20462#article5"] review
of current harvesting technologies. An interview with Günter
and other attendees of the Rochester Institute of Technology
conference in [link to "/en/page.php?Page_ID=20461#aework"] RLG
TopShelf, October 2004 shows that the
ideas of Automatic Exposure are well-received by the
community, and increasingly also the industry.
On October 25 in Baltimore, MD, Robin Dale spoke at the
Digital Library Federation's (DLF) Fall Forum, Session 8, "Managing
Metadata." On November 12 Günter Waibel discussed Automatic Exposure at the
Museum Computer Network (MCN) conference in Minneapolis, MN,
and on December 7 he presented at the Coalition for
Networked Information's (CNI) Task Force meeting Portland, OR.
August 2004
On September 8-9 in New York, NY, Robin Dale will
present Automatic Exposure findings and seek technical metadata changes
in International Imaging Industry Association (I3A) standards, speaking
with members of the I3A Image Technology committee IT10.
On September 22 in Rochester, NY, Günter Waibel will speak
about the project during the American Museums Digital Imaging Survey
Benchmarking Conference.
March 2004
On April 23 Günter Waibel presented a paper on
the Automatic Exposure initiative at the Society for Imaging Science
and Technology (IS&T) archiving conference in San Antonio,
Texas. For a copy of this paper, please consult the conference proceedings or contact
him directly.
February 2004
On November 5, 2003, RLG and the National Information
Standards Organization convened a meeting in Las Vegas (in conjunction
with the Museum Computer Network conference) to discuss a white paper
from RLG on Automatic Exposure and to plan next steps. Representatives
came from Adobe Systems, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Harvard University,
Kirtas Technologies, Museum of Modern Art, Sinar Bron Imaging, Stanford
University, University of California, Berkeley, and University of
Calgary. (See meeting
minutes and "XMP:
Adding Intelligence to Media" [pdf] Presentation by Gunar Penikis, Adobe Systems Incorporated).
August 2003
In July, RLG program officers Robin Dale and
Günter Waibel put out a widely distributed call for interest
in working with camera and scanner vendors to make metadata capture
automatic during digitizing. At the same time, they asked cultural
heritage institutions about their existing technical metadata
practices. Over 100 responses have demonstrated strong interest and
provided information both for identifying stakeholders and for
determining common metadata practices. Based on analysis of this
information, we anticipate convening an invitational meeting of vendors
and institution experts in November 2003.
|
|