North American Storage Trust (NAST)
Background
In 1999 members of the of
the Association of South Eastern Research Libraries Association (ASERL)
began discussing a cooperative "shared virtual storage" project. The
project was originally conceived by Paul Willis, dean of libraries at
the University of Kentucky, and Paul Gherman, university librarian of
Vanderbilt University, as an effort to promote shared institutional
commitments to retaining and sharing research collections held in
offsite library storage facilities. The idea gained further traction
during a 2002 ARL/OCLC Forum on Future
Library Architecture, when Don Kelsey (library facilities planner at
the University of Minnesota) observed that at least some offsite
library storage collections will "never be weeded"—suggesting
that a shared pool of low-use research collections could effectively be
maintained in perpetuity.
In 2003 OCLC Research
staff undertook a special project to identify unique holdings in
Vanderbilt University Library's collections. When compared to WorldCat
collections as a whole, some 24,000 titles were found to be held by
Vanderbilt University alone. Additional analysis was performed to
identify "true last copies" within Vanderbilt's collections,
effectively confirming that a systemwide approach to collection
management could enable the institution to make wise weeding and
preservation decisions. Results of this study were published in College
and Research Libraries; a preprint is available here.
In 2004 in collaboration
with OCLC, 9 ASERL members participated in a collection assessment
exercise directed at identifying overlaps in regional library holdings
and opportunities for systemwide rationalization of collections. These
efforts are described in an April 2005 article on ASERL's Virtual Storage/Preservation Concept
and in an Overview of ASERL's Proposed Virtual Storage
System (May 2005). The ASERL overlap study confirmed that
economies of scale could be achieved if member institutions adopted a
cooperative collection management regime.
In 2006 OCLC surveyed 500
member libraries in North America to explore the level of community
interest in a systemwide approach to managing print collections. Three
concepts embodying different levels of cooperative engagement were
tested, ranging from a simple data-sharing scheme to a transformative
model that would consolidate low-use collections in a shared physical
space and provide participants with cost-effective access and
preservation services. Results from the survey were presented at the
October 2006 meeting of the Association of Research Libraries and are
summarized here. A group of research
institutions interested in advancing the vision of shared print
management coalesced in the North American Storage Trust (NAST).
Current work
In December 2006 RLG
Programs began working with members of the NAST interest group to
develop a policy framework that would enable participating libraries to
implement shared collection management practices, including joint
commitments to retain and provide continuing access to "virtually
shared" research collections. A series of structured interviews with
managers of shared print repositories in the US and Canada helped to
identify gaps in current policy frameworks and core infrastructure
requirements for multi-institutional collection sharing.
A parallel effort to identify data requirements for a registry of items
held in library storage was also undertaken. Two focus groups of
institutions currently managing offsite
collections were convened to identify data
elements for a specially adapted collection analysis report.
Eventually, this dynamic report will help inform weeding and collection
management decisions, enabling institutions to make local decisions
based on the availability and preservation status of items held in
remote storage facilities.
Results from these parallel exercises were presented at a meeting of
the NAST interest group at the ALA Midwinter meeting in January
2007 and are available (in Powerpoint format) here:
Several working groups have been convened to build
consensus and provide outcomes in the following areas:
- Formulating a value proposition for shared print
management
- Establishing a common vocabulary (lexicon) for shared
print management
- Refining data requirements for collection analysis
Status and outcomes of continuing work in this area will
be shared informally with NAST interest group members and others at
national conferences (including ICOLC, ACRL, ARL and ALA) with most
work culminating by the end of June 2007. A joint implementation effort
with partner institutions will begin soon thereafter.
For additional information about this effort, contact Constance Malpas.
|