The battle for search supremacy is hardly over. In fact, search is in its early days and poised at the cusp of
several major leaps forward.
What impact will they have
on libraries? And how can
libraries benefit?
By Tom Storey
 |
“As any engineer in the search
field loves to tell you, search is
at best 5 percent solved—we’re
not even into the double digits
of its potential.”
John Battelle |
Ten years ago, a small
Mountain View, California
company rolled out
a plain search box and a
new computer algorithm to help
people find information. In the
month of January 2007, more
than 3.9 billion searches were
performed on Google, which
held a commanding 72 percent
of the global search market, according
to Nielsen//NetRatings
and Enquisite Software.
In addition, more than 255
million people worldwide used
a search engine—81 percent of
the global Internet population—and the audience for search
grew more than 10 percent,
outpacing the growth of the
Internet itself.
Clearly, it’s fair to say that
Google, along with a host of
other Internet search engines,
have fundamentally changed
the relationship between humanity
and knowledge, says
John Battelle, entrepreneur,
journalist, professor and author
of The Search: How
Google and Its Rivals Rewrote
the Rules of Business
and Transformed Our Culture. “Search is the new interface
to knowledge,” he says. “All
of a sudden, the world is quite
literally at your feet—or rather
your fingertips.”
So powerful is Google’s
impact that in 2006, Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary and the Oxford
English Dictionary added the
verb “google” to their hardbound
editions. The company
also was named one of the top
global brands by Business Week and brandchannel.com.
To an army of information seekers,
Google means search.
But the battle for search supremacy
is hardly over. In fact,
search is in its early days. And
several experts believe that
search stands today at the
threshold of a new era. Opportunities
exist for other companies
and organizations, including
libraries, to grab a portion of this
rapidly growing phenomenon.
“I totally believe that the search
landscape can change,” says
Roy Tennant, former User Services
Architect, California Digital Library,
University of California (Tennant recently accepted a position as Senior Programs Officer with the OCLC Programs and Research Division).
“In fact, since change is the
only constant, the question is
how will it change? I think it will
change by people waking up to
the fact that the lowest common
denominator searching
is fine for some things but not
for others.”
Battelle says that when it
comes to search, the most interesting
stuff is yet to come. “As any engineer in the search
field loves to tell you, search is
at best 5 percent solved—we’re
not even into the double digits
of its potential.”
Don Dodge, Director of Business
Development for
Microsoft’s Emerging
Business Team and
author of the blog The
Next Big Thing, adds
that it is important to
remember that when
Google was emerging,
there were already
huge dominant players
in search. “It didn’t look
promising for a start-up
in the search business.
Personalized portals were
the rage. AOL, Yahoo and
MSN actually outsourced
their search services.
Search was simply one of
many services, and not a
good one at that because
it didn’t keep users on
your site.”
Today’s search
explosion
 |
Experts believe that search stands today at the
threshold of a new era. Opportunities
exist for other companies
and organizations, including
libraries, to grab a portion of this
rapidly growing phenomenon.
|
Starting with Archie and Veronica in the early
1990s, search has been evolving from the
domain of academics and technologists
to mainstream culture. WWW Wander,
WebCrawler, Lycos, Excite, AltaVista and
Yahoo, which introduced new
and exciting features and functionality,
helped search gather
momentum and move closer
toward critical user mass.
But it wasn’t until 1998 when
Google came along and reinvented
search that the world
beat a path to Internet search
engines, particularly Google.
Google’s breakthrough technology
for page rank was far
superior to keyword matching
and index hierarchy used
by early Internet search services,
and it helped establish
a new level of relevance to
the Web as a viable part of
the information landscape. “Google did something that
few companies, institutions or
people have managed to do—provide a service that
dramatically increases millions
of people’s ability to
connect to useful information,” Battelle says.
Tennant agrees. “They
effectively solved a problem that was
meaningful to people. They built a
robust Web-crawling infrastructure
and came up with a
useful and unique algorithm
for ranking search results
that caused the most
typically relevant items to
sift to the top. Then they
made it pay by figuring out
the right advertising model
for the Internet.”
OCLC research confirms the dominance of
search engines as the tool to discover resources. In the OCLC report Perceptions of Libraries
and Information Resources, respondents indicated
that search engines deliver better quality
and quantity of information than library-assisted
searching—and at greater speed. Information
consumers also trust the information they
get from search engines as much as they
trust information from libraries.
In addition, over half
of respondents indicated
that search engines fit their
lifestyles compared to only 17
percent who said libraries are
a perfect fit. More than 20
percent said libraries do not
fit their lifestyles. Of the activities
that respondents are doing
less since they began using the
Internet, watching television was
number one and using the library
was number two. Reading books
was third.
That library resources and librarians
add value to information search
was not disputed by respondents
but the data suggests that the relevancy
and lifestyle fit of that value
are in question.
Recent independent
research verifies OCLC’s
findings. In its report The
User Revolution, investment
firm Piper Jaffray states that in
less than 10 years, the Internet
has grown from a tool that almost
no one used, to one of the most widely
used commerce, entertainment and
information mediums, rivaling the use
of television and perhaps exceeding the
use of the library as an information source.
The firm estimates that
worldwide search query volume
will grow at an annual
rate of 23 percent. “Search
has changed from a tool for
finding Web sites to what we
consider the new navigational
platform,” the report says. “Search encompasses nearly everything that users
want to do online. As such we believe search and search engines have become the new portals.”
How big can
search get?
Every day, search continues to evolve and
grow in popularity. Today, searchers have access
to an estimated 10 billion pages of online
text, thanks to Google, Yahoo!, MSN and other
search engines. And in the short term, search
engines, particularly Google, are forecast to
continue to dominate the search market.
 |
“Search engines today tend to ignore metadata. But using metadata
will sweeten the indexing and ranking.”
Roy Tennant |
A new frontier of search is on the horizon, however,
ready to disrupt the current environment
and present a wide range of new possibilities.
The next generation of search will be smarter,
more tailored to the individual, embrace video
and music and be accessible from any device
with a chip. Among the possibilities:
Smart search. Many people refer to this as
natural language search or semantic search,
where search engines scan indexes and use
logic to look for meaning, not just matching keywords.
Smart search is based on understanding
user intent, and understanding the meaning
of information available on various Web documents.
In this way search engines could begin
to answer questions in everyday language. Although
he is skeptical about the practicality of
the Semantic Web, Tennant sees the benefit of
using rich metadata associated with scholarly
works to sharpen search results.
“Search engines today tend to ignore metadata,”
says Tennant. “But using metadata
will sweeten the indexing and ranking. This
is becoming increasingly important as millions
of scanned books become available. Without
metadata, good luck with providing good
search results.”
Personalized search. What are your likes,
dislikes? What are your preferences? If a search
engine knew, search results could be highly customized
and mirror your specific interests. Personalized
search would deliver results tailored
to who you are, what you are researching and
your past search history, Battelle says. “The idea
behind personal search is pretty simple: the
more an engine knows about you, the more it
can weed out irrelevant results,” he says.
Tennant believes there is much experimentation
to be done on useful ways of sifting through results.“ If someone can create a search engine that
provides more sophisticated ways of narrowing in
on what you want from among thousands or millions
of items, that will be a tool worth using.”
Domain-specific search. Domain-specific
search would focus on one area of knowledge,
creating customized search experiences that,
because of the domain’s limited corpus and
clear relationships between concepts, provide extremely relevant results for searchers. Battelle
calls this structured search—the ability
to use search as an interface to knowledge in
specific subject areas.
Tennant sees possibilities here as well. “Niche
search engines will find audiences since they
can be tuned to the particular needs of a
user community.”
 |
“Mobile devices will become
the communication and computing
platform of choice within
five years. It already is
with teenagers.”
Don Dodge |
Picture, audio and video search. As sound
and still and moving images are increasingly digitized
and broadband penetration grows, video,
audio and image search are on the upswing and
quickly gaining prominence with Internet users.
Think of the phenomenal growth of iPods, podcasting,
Flickr, YouTube, Blinkx, Metacafe.com
and searchforvideo.com to name a few. Possible
technological breakthroughs that could accelerate
the trend are enhanced online playback and
improved algorithms in speech recognition and
visual analysis.
Mobile search.
Mobile search is
the convergence of
search engines and
mobile devices, such
as cell phones, PDAs
and other pocketsized
computing devices.
With millions of
cell phones and mobile
devices worldwide,
Dodge believes that mobile
search is potentially
the largest opportunity in
the search landscape. The
secret to success, he says,
will be user interface design,
which means both the ease of
entering queries and the clear
presentation of search results
tailored for mobile devices.
“Mobile devices will become
the communication and computing
platform of choice within
five years,” he says. “It already is
with teenagers.”
Dodge also believes that cell
phones will lead the way with
voice-driven search. “Voice recognition
is way better today that it
was five years ago, and the phone
has a perfect microphone already
built in. Why not allow the user
to enter commands and search
queries via voice rather than text
entry? Why not return the results
via computer-generated voice
rather than text? Why not allow
the user to get the results both
ways? This will be big!”
Social search. Social search
determines the relevance of
search results by considering the
interactions or contributions of
users. One of the fastest-growing
social search techniques
is tagging, a grassroots phenomenon
whereby users label
Web sites with descriptive tags,
building a network of knowledge
dubbed folksonomy—a taxonomy
of knowledge organized by
ordinary folk. Battelle calls this“finding that which your community
finds interesting.”
Search
everywhere
Beyond the frontiers of the next
generation of search stands yet
another world with unimagined
network devices and objects.
Within two decades, Battelle
says, nearly everything of value
will be tagged with tiny computing
devices and incorporate
network-aware search. RFID
chips will enable computers
to automatically recognize and
identify everyday objects and
trace, track, monitor and trigger
events, and perform actions on
those objects.
“Think about that—Google your dog, your
kid, your luggage, your
purse, your cell phone,
your car,” Battelle says. “The list quickly stretches
toward the infinite. Anywhere
there might be a chip,
there can and most likely will
be search.”
What does
it mean for
libraries?
The dominance of search engines
for discovering resources
is unlikely to diminish substantially
in the future, but libraries
can increase their participation in
the online world and the search
engine revolution.
 |
“Search encompasses nearly everything that users want to do online. As such we believe search and search engines have become the new portals.”
Piper Jaffray |
OCLC is building a platform,
WorldCat.org, to make
it easy for libraries, collectively
and individually, to
deliver their services to
the network and build a unified, high-value consumer
presence on the
Web. WorldCat.org integrates
library
content and services
with Web
search engines,
Internet booksellers,
online bibliographies and
commercial publishers. It also
provides a permanent Web page
dedicated solely to searching the
world’s libraries and a downloadable search box that anyone can
download to a blog or Web site.
With WorldCat.org, Web searchers
discover library resources in
their results lists and move from
the Web to their local libraries.
And OCLC members become
more visible and their collections
and eServices more accessible
from sites where many people
start their search for information.
Tennant notes that despite
the fact people start at search
engines, that does not mean
they end there. “We find that
although many of our students
begin with Google, they realize
the benefit of commercial databases
and they will often end
there. What libraries need to do
is to create search services tailored
to the particular needs of
our clientele. If we understand
their needs well enough, and
do a good enough job in meeting
those needs, they will come.
All we need to do is effectively
solve a problem that people
care about.”
Battelle says that, simply put,
librarians need to become the
experts in using the tools we
all use to gather information.“Experts will always be in demand
by the public. This means
become experts in search.”
The importance of understanding
search and its cultural
ramifications cannot be understated,
he says. “Search is no
longer a stand-alone application,
a useful but impersonal tool for
finding something on a new medium
called the World Wide Web.
Increasingly search is our mechanism
for how we understand
ourselves, our world and our
place within it. It’s how we
navigate the one infinite resource
that drives human culture: knowledge.
Perfect search—every
single possible bit of information
at our fingertips, perfectly contextualized,
perfectly personalized—may never be realized. But the
journey to find out if it just might
be is certainly going to be fun.”
Libraries will be a part of the
journey.
Updates | The Internet of Things
|